As we have discussed in class, many religious rituals have
adapted some form of online medium. There are different understandings of the
word “ritual”, but as defined by Helland, ritual is purposeful engagement with
the sacred. For the Christian, one of the most intentional and purposeful forms
of engagement with the sacred is prayer. Prayer, like ritual, is something that
is difficult to define. For the Christian, prayer is the act of engaging in
some sort of conversation with God, either out loud or in one’s own mind, in a
solitary place or within community. The prayer can be words of adoration and
worship, thanksgiving, pleas of conversation for help, or just simple rest. Most
Christians believe they can pray anytime, anywhere, about anything, because God
is always listening and wants to hear from his children. As more and more of our
culture moves online, it is no surprise that many mediums of prayer have moved
online as well. This is a little tricky because most Christians do not believe
that prayer is something that necessarily happens by the act of ritual but more
by a sincere act of the heart. What I mean is this: there is a difference
between just reading a prayer that is posted online to God just as a ritual act
to be done, and reading that prayer with a sincere heart of faith to God. For
example, the website www.bible.com has a “prayer
room” (http://www.bible.com/prayerroom/index.php
), where prayers are posted that the believer can look upon, reflect upon, or
even pray. There are also forums where you can post prayer requests (things the
believer wants other believers to pray about on their behalf) or praises
(praises to God for answered prayers). Some questions raised in class
concerning online rituals that I’d like to address are do they have
supernatural efficacy, what are their limits, and what needs do they fulfill
for the individual/community. In the context of a prayer room, there can be
supernatural efficacy, but again, this deals not so much with the actual ritual
itself (the act of reading some prayer) as it deals with the question of the
heart’s intent and the legitimacy of the faith behind the prayer. If that
person believes what the prayer they are praying that they found online with
heartfelt conviction, then it is a prayer. I think there are several limits to
online prayer rooms, especially the isolation aspect. One can log onto the
internet and get onto a prayer room without knowing or being known by anyone in
the online prayer room. It is much easier to say (or not say) many things when
behind a computer screen. For example, a man might be a raging alcoholic and
porn addict who logs online and joins this prayer room, but instead of asking
for prayer for his addictions, he asks for prayer for much lighter subjects.
When there is no accountability, it is easier for the believer to be fake about
what they are really dealing with. This touches on the needs for individuals
and communities addressed online. Of course online communities can give you
some sense of community, but I’d argue that there is a big difference between synthesized
community through a computer and real face-to-face-living-life-together
community. Anybody can say they are whoever they want when they are behind a
computer screen.
To conclude, I do not think online prayer rooms are awful
and evil, nor do I think they are the best thing ever. I think that when used
with the right intentions, prayer rooms can be a beneficial tool to strengthen
the body of faith, (though I realize “right intentions” can arguably be
subjective). However, I think these online prayer rooms should serve more as a
supplement for an already existing community in which people are known and
knowing others. The people involved should know that prayer is not just a
ritual in the Christian faith; otherwise you are missing the whole point.
Prayer is connecting with the God who loves us (as Christians believe), and is
a matter of the heart, not just the head.
No comments:
Post a Comment